February 2026 Global Fertilizer & Petrochemical Market Report

February 2026 fertilizer market report covering urea, ammonia, sulfur, phosphates, freight dynamics, Middle East geopolitical risks, and the Q2 2026 outlook.

Executive Summary

Strong fertilizer market fundamentals, elevated geopolitical uncertainty, and increasing freight market sensitivity to developments in the Persian Gulf region characterized February 2026. Global fertilizer and petrochemical markets remained supported by robust agricultural demand, active Indian procurement programs, resilient Brazilian imports, and continued supply constraints across several key exporting regions.


Despite temporary corrections in selected nutrient markets, the broader market environment remained constructive. Strong crop economics, relatively low inventories in major consuming regions, limited Chinese export participation, and persistent logistical risks continued to support international fertilizer prices.


The nitrogen sector remained the strongest-performing segment of the fertilizer complex. India’s large-scale urea procurement activities, combined with firm demand from Latin America and limited Chinese export participation, maintained upward pressure on international prices throughout much of the month. Middle East granular urea FOB values approached the upper USD 480s/t range, while importers continued securing volumes ahead of the Q2 application season.


Ammonia markets softened moderately during February as supply availability improved and buyers delayed purchases in anticipation of further price corrections. Nevertheless, ammonia values remained historically elevated compared with long-term averages due to energy market volatility, freight inflation, and geopolitical risk premiums.


Sulfur markets entered a correction phase following the exceptional rally observed during late 2025 and January 2026. Buyers in China, India, and Southeast Asia became increasingly resistant to record-high prices, resulting in moderate declines across most benchmarks. However, low Chinese inventories, weather-related logistical disruptions in Morocco, and expanding demand for Indonesian nickel processing continued to support the medium-term outlook.


Phosphate markets remained among the strongest fertilizer sectors globally. Tight supply from major exporters, logistical challenges in Morocco, elevated sulfur costs, and healthy demand from South Asia and Southeast Asia continued to support DAP and MAP prices. Limited Chinese export participation further strengthened market sentiment.


The petrochemical sector displayed mixed performance. Methanol markets remained relatively well supported, while polymer markets faced pressure from weaker manufacturing activity in parts of Asia. Nevertheless, freight uncertainty and geopolitical developments continued to support export-oriented producers across the Persian Gulf region.


Geopolitical developments remained one of the most influential market drivers throughout February. While shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remained operational, increased military activity, regional tensions, and heightened maritime security concerns contributed to higher marine insurance costs, elevated freight rates, and broader risk-adjusted pricing across fertilizer and petrochemical markets.

Executive Dashboard

February 2026 Market Performance

Segment February Trend Market Strength Outlook
Granular Urea ▲ Strong Very Bullish Firm
Prilled Urea ▲ Strong Bullish Firm
Ammonia ▼ Moderate Correction Neutral Stable to Soft
Sulphur ▼ Correcting Neutral Recovery Potential
Phosphates ▲ Strong Bullish Firm
Potash ► Stable Neutral Stable to Firm
NPK ▲ Firm Bullish Firm
Petrochemicals ► Mixed Neutral Mixed
Freight ▲ Elevated Supportive Elevated
Geopolitical Risk ▲ High Critical High

Key Price Indicators

Commodity January 2026 February 2026 Change
Middle East Urea FOB USD 455/t USD 488/t +7.3%
Brazil Urea CFR USD 445/t USD 475/t +6.7%
Middle East Ammonia FOB USD 498/t USD 480/t -3.6%
Middle East Sulfur FOB USD 507/t USD 495/t -2.4%
DAP China FOB USD 680/t USD 710/t +4.4%

Commodity Momentum Index


Strongest Markets

  1. Urea
  2. Phosphates
  3. NPK


Stable Markets

  1. Potash
  2. Petrochemicals


Correcting Markets

  1. Sulphur
  2. Ammonia




Global Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Potential Market Impact
Strait of Hormuz Disruption Very High Severe
Persian Gulf Geopolitical Escalation High Severe
Chinese Export Policy Changes High Significant
Freight Inflation High Significant
Energy Price Volatility High Significant
Indian Tender Activity Medium-High Strong
Weather-Related Disruptions Medium Moderate

Global Trade Flow Snapshot


Persian Gulf


      │

      ├────────► India (Strong Urea Demand)

      │

      ├────────► Brazil (Robust Import Activity)

      │

      ├────────► China (Low Sulphur Inventories)

      │

      └────────► Morocco (Phosphate Supply Constraints)


Q2 2026 Strategic Outlook


Bullish Driver

  • Strong Indian fertilizer procurement activity
  • Limited Chinese fertilizer exports
  • Low sulfur inventories in China
  • Tight phosphate availability
  • Elevated freight rates
  • Healthy agricultural economics
  • Persistent geopolitical risk premiums


Bearish Driver

  • Recovery of Iranian production and exports
  • Improving ammonia availability
  • Affordability concerns among importers
  • Slower industrial demand in parts of Asia
  • Potential demand destruction at extreme price levels

Market Outlook Scorecard

Market Q2 2026 Outlook
Urea Firm
Ammonia Stable to Soft
Sulphur Correcting with Recovery Potential
Phosphates Firm
Potash Stable to Firm
NPK Firm
Petrochemicals Mixed
Freight Elevated

Key Takeaways for Market Participants



  • Producers: Maintain pricing discipline while closely monitoring Indian procurement activity, developments in Chinese export policy, and geopolitical risks in the Persian Gulf.
  • Traders: Freight volatility, regional arbitrage opportunities, and supply-chain risk management are expected to remain key profit drivers during Q2 2026.
  • Importers: Forward coverage remains advisable for phosphates and NPK products due to continuing supply constraints and elevated replacement costs.
  • Investors: The fertilizer sector remains fundamentally stronger than most industrial commodity segments heading into Q2 2026, particularly for phosphates, NPKs, and premium nitrogen products.

Global Economic Environment


Global Economic Conditions

February 2026 was characterized by moderating inflation, resilient agricultural demand, and elevated geopolitical uncertainty. While economic growth in several developed economies continued to slow relative to post-pandemic recovery levels, emerging markets across Asia, Africa, and Latin America remained relatively resilient and continued to support global fertilizer consumption.


The International Monetary Fund (IMF) maintained expectations for moderate global economic growth in 2026, supported by improving supply chains, stable labor markets, and easing inflationary pressures in several major economies. However, geopolitical tensions, elevated shipping costs, energy market volatility, and ongoing trade uncertainties continued to pose downside risks to economic activity.


For fertilizer markets, the macroeconomic environment remained generally supportive. Agricultural producers continued benefiting from relatively favorable crop economics, encouraging nutrient application and supporting fertilizer purchasing programs. Governments in several developing economies maintained agricultural support measures to improve food security, increase domestic crop production, and reduce import dependence.


Agricultural Fundamentals Remain Supportive

Global agricultural demand remained one of the strongest pillars supporting fertilizer consumption during February.


Population growth, food security concerns, changing dietary patterns, and increasing productivity requirements continued to drive long-term nutrient demand. Many countries across Asia, Africa, and Latin America expanded fertilizer subsidy programs and agricultural development initiatives to support domestic production and strengthen food security.


Key Demand Drivers

Driver First NameMarket Impact
Expanding Global Food Demand Strong
Government Agricultural Support Programs Strong
Rising Crop Nutrient Requirements Strong
Agricultural Intensification Strong
Higher Yield Targets Strong
Food Security Policies Strong

As a result, fertilizer demand remained resilient despite elevated nutrient prices and higher logistics costs.


Global Economic Indicators Dashboard

Indicator February 2026 Assessment Impact on Fertilizer Markets
Global GDP Growth Moderate Supportive
Agricultural Demand Strong Bullish
Food Security Programs Expanding Bullish
Inflation Moderating Supportive
Interest Rates Elevated Neutral
Freight Costs High Bullish
Energy Prices Volatile Bullish
Geopolitical Risk High Bullish

Macro Impact on Fertilizer Markets

Factor Urea Ammonia Sulphur Phosphates NPK
Agricultural Demand High Medium Medium High High
Energy Costs High Very High Low Medium Medium
Freight Costs Medium High High Medium Medium
Geopolitical Risk High High High Medium Medium
Chinese Export Policy High Low Medium High Medium

Key Macroeconomic Themes for Q2 2026

Theme First NameExpected Market Impact
Stable Global Economic Growth Supportive
Strong Agricultural Demand Bullish
Elevated Freight Costs Bullish
Energy Market Volatility Bullish
Food Security Programs Supportive
Geopolitical Uncertainty Bullish
High Interest Rates Neutral

Economic Outlook

Looking ahead to Q2 2026, the macroeconomic environment is expected to remain broadly supportive for fertilizer markets. While affordability concerns may emerge in certain regions, food security requirements, government agricultural programs, and seasonal demand patterns are likely to continue to support global nutrient consumption.


Overall, agricultural fundamentals remain considerably stronger than industrial demand indicators, providing a solid foundation for fertilizer consumption despite ongoing geopolitical and logistical uncertainties.


Sources & References

Geopolitical Risk Assessment


Middle East Geopolitical Landscape

The Middle East remained the single most important geopolitical factor influencing global fertilizer and petrochemical markets during February 2026. Market participants closely monitored developments across the Persian Gulf region as geopolitical tensions continued to affect commodity pricing, freight costs, insurance premiums, and supply-chain risk assessments.


Although no major disruption to commercial shipping occurred during the month, increased military activity, heightened regional tensions, and concerns regarding maritime security contributed to stronger risk-adjusted pricing across fertilizer, energy, and petrochemical markets


For commodity traders, producers, and importers, geopolitical risk premiums became an increasingly important component of procurement and inventory management strategies


Strategic Importance of the Persian Gulf

The Persian Gulf remains one of the world’s most important commodity-export regions and a critical hub for global fertilizer, petrochemical, and energy trade.

Commodity Strategic Importance
Ammonia Very High
Sulphur Very High
Methanol Very High
LNG Critical
Urea Feedstocks High
Polymer Feedstocks High
Crude Oil Critical

A substantial share of globally traded fertilizers, petrochemical products, and energy commodities depends, directly or indirectly, on maritime routes originating in the Persian Gulf.


Strait of Hormuz Risk Assessment

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most strategically important maritime chokepoints in the global economy.


Approximately one-fifth of global seaborne crude oil trade and a significant portion of global LNG exports pass through this corridor. The route also serves as a key export channel for ammonia, sulfur, methanol, polymers, and fertilizer feedstocks produced throughout the Gulf region


Potential Impact of a Major Disruption

Sector Risk Level Potential Market Impact
Crude Oil Very High Severe
LNG Very High Severe
Ammonia Very High Severe
Sulphur Very High Severe
Methanol Very High Severe
Urea Feedstocks High Significant
Polymers High Significant
Freight Markets Very High Severe

Geopolitical Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Market Impact
Strait of Hormuz Disruption Very High Severe
Regional Military Escalation High Severe
Shipping Insurance Costs High Significant
Energy Price Volatility High Significant
Supply Chain Disruptions High Significant
Trade Restrictions & Sanctions Medium Moderate

Impact on Fertilizer & Petrochemical Markets

Even without a direct disruption to vessel traffic, elevated geopolitical uncertainty affected global markets through several channels:

Market Impact Channel Effect
Marine Insurance Premiums Higher Logistics Costs
Freight Rates Higher Delivered Prices
Inventory Management Increased Working Capital Requirements
Supply Chain Planning Longer Procurement Cycles
Energy Markets Higher Production Cost Risk
Commodity Trading Increased Price Volatility

As a result, geopolitical developments continued to provide indirect support to fertilizer and petrochemical prices throughout February.


Strategic Outlook

The geopolitical environment is expected to remain a key market driver throughout Q2 2026. Even in the absence of direct supply disruptions, elevated uncertainty is likely to sustain freight premiums, increase supply-chain management costs, and support risk-adjusted commodity pricing.


Particular attention should remain focused on:

Key Monitoring Area Market Relevance
Strait of Hormuz Security Critical
Persian Gulf Maritime Activity High
Regional Energy Exports High
Freight & Insurance Costs High
Sanctions & Trade Policies Medium
Global Energy Prices High

Overall, geopolitical developments in the Persian Gulf are expected to remain among the most influential external factors affecting global fertilizer, petrochemical, and freight markets during Q2 2026.


Freight & Logistics Overview


Global Freight Market Condition

Freight markets remained elevated throughout February 2026 as shipowners, charterers, commodity traders, and insurers continued evaluating geopolitical and operational risks affecting global maritime trade.


Although no major shipping disruptions occurred during the month, elevated geopolitical uncertainty in the Persian Gulf, weather-related delays in several exporting regions, Baltic winter conditions, and vessel availability constraints continued to support freight rates across fertilizer and petrochemical trade routes


The freight environment remained one of the most important supportive factors for fertilizer prices globally. Higher transportation costs increased delivered nutrient prices in major importing regions, particularly Brazil, India, Southeast Asia, and East Africa.


Elevated insurance costs, longer vessel positioning times, and increasingly conservative risk-management practices contributed to higher overall logistics costs throughout February.


Freight Market Dashboard


February 2026 Freight Assessment

Route Freight (USD/t) Trend
Middle East → East Coast India 17–22 Stable
Middle East → Indonesia 19–24 Firm
Middle East → South China 20-27 Firm
Middle East → Brazil 27-28 Elevated
US Gulf → Brazil 23-25 Stable
Vancouver → China 27-32 Elevated
Baltic → Brazil 70-73 Elevated
Black Sea → Türkiye 38-42 Stable

Highest-Cost Freight Routes

Ranking Route Freight Level
1 Baltic → Brazil Very High
2 Black Sea → Türkiye High
3 Vancouver → China High
4 Middle East → Brazil Elevated
5 US Gulf → Brazil Moderate
6 Middle East → South China Moderate
7 Middle East → Indonesia Moderate
8 Middle East → East Coast India Moderate

Key Freight Market Drivers

1. Geopolitical Risk Premium

Growing uncertainty surrounding the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz continued to influence freight markets during February.


sWhile vessel traffic remained uninterrupted, shipowners and insurers increasingly incorporated contingency planning and risk-management costs into freight quotations


Market Impac

  • Higher marine insurance premiums
  • Elevated charter rates
  • Increased voyage risk calculations
  • More conservative vessel deployment strategies

2. Limited Vessel Availability

Several dry bulk shipping segments experienced tighter vessel availability than anticipated.


Market participants reported

  • Longer vessel positioning times
  • Delayed loading schedules
  • Increased competition for prompt tonnage
  • Higher replacement freight costs


These factors particularly affected fertilizer cargoes originating from the Persian Gulf, the Baltic Sea, and the Black Sea

3. Weather-Related Disruptions

Weather conditions continued to affect logistics performance in several key export regions.

Region Impact
Morocco Delayed sulfur discharge operations
Baltic Sea Ice restrictions and reduced vessel flexibility
Northern Europe Slower vessel turnaround times
Black Sea Intermittent weather disruptions

These operational inefficiencies reduced vessel productivity and increased voyage durations.

4. Strong Fertilizer Trade Flows

Global fertilizer trade activity remained healthy throughout February.
The most active import demand centers included:

Destination Market Primary Products
India Urea, DAP, Ammonia
Brazil Urea, MAP, Potash
East Africa NPK, Urea
Southeast Asia Urea, Sulfur, NPK

India’s large urea procurement activity and continued Brazilian import demand generated significant vessel requirements, helping support freight markets.

Freight Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Impact on Freight Markets
Strait of Hormuz Tensions Very High Severe
Insurance Premium Inflation High Significant
Vessel Availability Constraints High Significant
Fuel Price Volatility High Significant
Weather Disruptions Medium Moderate
Port Congestion Medium Moderate

Impact on Fertilizer Markets

Freight costs continued to serve as an important support mechanism for fertilizer prices, raising replacement costs across major importing regions.

Commodity Freight Sensitivity
Ammonia Very High
Sulphur Very High
Urea High
Phosphates High
NPK Medium
Potash Medium

As a result, even when commodity fundamentals softened temporarily, elevated logistics costs helped prevent sharper price corrections.

Freight Outlook – Q2 2026


Supportive Factor

  • Geopolitical uncertainty in the Persian Gulf
  • Elevated insurance costs
  • Healthy fertilizer trade activity
  • Limited prompt vessel availability
  • Potential weather-related disruptions


Moderating Factor

  • Slower industrial demand growth
  • Additional vessel supply entering the market
  • Potential declines in bunker fuel costs
  • Reduced speculative trading activity

Freight Market Outlook Scorecard

Route Category Outlook
Persian Gulf Routes Elevated
Brazil Routes Elevated
India Routes Firm
China Routes Firm
Baltic Routes Elevated
Black Sea Routes Stable

Overall, freight markets are expected to remain elevated throughout Q2 2026. Even without direct geopolitical disruptions, persistent uncertainty surrounding the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz is likely to maintain a meaningful risk premium across fertilizer and petrochemical shipping routes.


February 2026 Market Snapshot


Commodity Performance Dashboard

Sector Trend Market Assessment Q2 Outlook
Urea ▲ Strong Bullish Firm
Ammonia ▼ Softening Neutral Stable to Soft
Sulphur ▼ Correcting Neutral Recovery Potential
Phosphates ▲ Firm Bullish Firm
Potash ► Stable Neutral Stable to Firm
NPK ▲ Firm Bullish Firm
Petrochemicals ► Mixed Neutral Mixed
Freight ▲ Eedlevat Supportive Elevated
Geopolitical Risk ▲ High Critical High

Market Momentum Ranking

Rank Market Segment Momentum
1 Urea Very Strong
2 Phosphates Strong
3 NPK Strong
4 Potash Moderate
5 Petrochemicals Neutral
6 Sulphur Correcting
7 Ammonia Softening

Strategic Takeaways

Stakeholder Key Consideration
Producers Elevated freight costs continue supporting export netbacks.
Traders Freight volatility and logistics management remain key profit drivers.
Importers Planning remains essential due to elevated shipping costs and geopolitical uncertainty.
Importers Freight markets continue to provide structural support for fertilizer pricing heading into Q2 2026.

Global Nitrogen Market Overview


Nitrogen Market Remains the Strongest Fertilizer Segment

The nitrogen sector remained the best-performing segment of the global fertilizer industry throughout February 2026. Strong import demand from India, resilient purchasing activity in Brazil, limited Chinese export participation, and ongoing supply-side uncertainties collectively maintained supportive market conditions despite affordability concerns in some regions.


Global buyers remained focused on securing products ahead of the Northern Hemisphere spring application season. At the same time, producers benefited from favorable agricultural economics, healthy crop margins, and relatively tight spot availability across several major exporting regions.


Unlike ammonia, which experienced a moderate correction due to improving supply availability, urea prices remained firmly supported by active tender participation, inventory replenishment, and healthy import demand across key agricultural markets.


Nitrogen Market Dashboard

February 2026 Performance Summary

Segment Market Trend Assessment Q2 Outlook
Granular Urea ▲ Strong Bullish Firm
Prilled Urea ▲ Firm Bullish Firm
Ammonia ▼ Correcting Neutral Stable to Soft
India Demand ▲ Strong Bullish Strong
Brazil Demand ▲ Healthy Supportive Stable
China Exports ▼ Limited Supportive of Prices Limited
Iran Production ▲ Increasing Bearish Risk Increasing

Regional Urea Market Performance

Region Market Condition
India Very Strong
Brazil Strong
Europe Firm
Middle East Bullish
Southeast Asia Firm
China Supply-Constrained
Africa Supportive

Urea Market Analysis


Global Urea Price Development

February was largely defined by India’s return to the market through a major import tender and by continued uncertainty surrounding export availability from key producing regions.


Middle East FOB prices strengthened significantly compared with January levels, supported by aggressive bidding from international buyers, improving sentiment across destination markets, and concerns regarding future supply availability


.The market entered February with supportive fundamentals already in place following January’s rally, and India’s tender activity provided an additional boost, helping exporters maintain pricing discipline


Granular Urea Price Assessment – February 2026

Market Low High Midpoint
Middle East FOB USD 485/t USD 490/t USD 487.5/t
Iran FOB USD 427/t USD 432/t USD 429.5/t
Egypt FOB USD 485/t USD 495/t USD 490.0/t
Algeria FOB USD 475/t USD 500/t USD 487.0/t
Brazil CFR USD 470/t USD 480/t USD 475.0/t
US Gulf CFR USD 489/t USD 505/t USD 497.0/t
Southeast Asia CFR USD 475/t USD 500/t USD 487.5/t
China FOB USD 455/t USD 487/t USD 471.0/t

Urea Price Ranking (Midpoint Basis)

Rank Market Midpoint Price
1 US Gulf CFR USD 497.0/t
2 Egypt FOB USD 490.0/t
3 Middle East FOB USD 487.5/t
4 Algeria FOB USD 487.5/t
5 Southeast Asia CFR USD 487.5/t
6 Brazil CFR USD 475.0/t
7 China FOB USD 471.0/t
8 Iran FOB USD 429.5/t

India Market Analysis


The Primary Driver of Global Urea Demand

India once again emerged as the dominant force in the global urea market during February.


The RCF tender attracted more than 3 million tonnes of supplier participation, significantly exceeding the target volume of approximately 1.5 million tonnes. This confirmed India’s role as the most influential import market for globally traded urea and established the pricing benchmark for the remainder of the month.


The tender significantly influenced producer expectations worldwide and reduced spot availability across several export regions.


Impact of India’s Tender Activity

  • Strong supplier participation
  • Increased market confidence
  • Improved producer pricing power
  • Strengthened Middle East FOB values
  • Reduced spot availability
  • Higher replacement costs


India’s Strategic Importance

Factor Importance
Import Volume Very High
Price Discovery Very High
Global Sentiment Very High
Tender Influence Critical

India Outlook

Government fertilizer subsidy programs continue to support affordability and maintain import requirements. Future tender activity during March and April will remain one of the most important variables influencing global nitrogen prices in Q2 2026.


Brazil Market Analysis

Demand Remains Resilient

Brazil continued demonstrating resilient fertilizer demand despite elevated global prices.


Importers remained active in securing products for the upcoming agricultural season, although purchasing decisions became increasingly selective as affordability concerns emerged


Brazil CFR Urea Assessment

Market Price Range
Brazil CFR USD 470–480/t

Brazil remained one of the most important destinations for Middle Eastern, North African, and Russian material. Despite elevated prices, import requirements remained substantial due to the country’s large soybean, corn, and sugarcane sectors.

Key Risks Facing Brazil

Risk Factor Impact
Currency Volatility Medium
Farmer Affordability Medium
Freight Inflation High
Logistics Delays Medium

Brazil Outlook

Demand fundamentals remain supportive heading into Q2, although affordability concerns could moderate purchasing activity if prices continue rising.


China Market Analysis


Export Participation Remains Limited

China remained a critical variable for global nitrogen markets throughout February.


Although domestic production remained adequate, export availability continued to be constrained by regulatory and policy measures limiting international shipments.


This reduced export participation supported global prices by restricting supply availability for importing regions.


Market Impact of Chinese Export Restrictions

Factor Market Effect
Limited Exports Bullish
Domestic Supply Priority Bullish
Reduced Global Availability Bullish
Higher Import Dependence Elsewhere Bullish

Strategic Assessment

Any significant increase in Chinese export availability would represent one of the largest downside risks to global urea prices during Q2 2026.


Iran Market Analysis


The Key Bearish Variable for Q2 2026

Iran remained one of the most closely monitored nitrogen producers during February.


Gas supply conditions improved compared with previous months, allowing producers to gradually increase operating rates and return production capacity to the market.


Iran FOB Urea Assessment

Market Price Range
Iran FOB USD 427–432/t

Iran remained the most competitively priced supplier among major exporting regions. The significant price discount relative to other Middle Eastern producers continued to make Iranian material attractive in price-sensitive destinations.


Key Market Variable

  • Natural gas availability
  • Export logistics
  • Regional geopolitical developments
  • Strait of Hormuz security
  • Production recovery rates

Iran Risk Matrix

Number First Name Email Address
1 Anne anne.evans@mail.com
2 Bill Fernandez bill.fernandez@mail.com
3 Candice Gates candice.gates@mail.com
4 Dave Hill dave.hill@mail.com
Risk Factor Risk Level Market Impact
Indian Tender Activity Very High Strong
Iranian Production Recovery High Significant
Chinese Export Policy High Significant
Freight Inflation High Significant
Energy Price Volatility High Significant
Strait of Hormuz Tensions High Significant

Urea Market Outlook – Q2 2026


Supportive Factors

  • Strong Indian demand
  • Resilient Brazilian imports
  • Limited Chinese exports
  • Elevated freight rates
  • Geopolitical risk premiums
  • Tight spot availability


Downside Risks

  • Iranian production recovery
  • Potential increase in export availability
  • Affordability concerns
  • Seasonal demand normalization

Market Outlook Scorecard

Market Segment Outlook
Granular Urea Firm
Prilled Urea Firm
India Imports Strong
Brazil Demand Stable
China Exports Limited
Iran Supply Increasing
Global Nitrogen Balance Constructive

Strategic Conclusion

The nitrogen market enters Q2 2026 in a fundamentally constructive position. Strong Indian demand, resilient Brazilian imports, and limited Chinese export participation continue supporting prices, while elevated freight costs and geopolitical risk premiums provide additional market support.


However, the recovery of Iranian production capacity and any meaningful change in Chinese export policy remain the two most important downside risks facing global urea markets


Ammonia Market Analysis


Global Ammonia Market Overview

The global ammonia market softened during February 2026, moving in the opposite direction to urea. While urea prices remained supported by strong Indian procurement activity and healthy agricultural demand, ammonia faced increasing supply availability, weaker spot demand in Asia, and a lengthening market east of Suez.


Following the strong rally observed during Q4 2025 and January 2026, the ammonia market entered a consolidation phase as producers increased operating rates and buyers adopted a more cautious purchasing strategy.


The most significant development during February was the gradual normalization of Middle Eastern production, which increased spot cargo availability and eased some of the supply concerns that had supported prices in previous months.


Despite the correction, ammonia prices remained historically elevated due to energy market volatility, elevated freight costs, and persistent geopolitical risk premiums.


Global Ammonia Market Dashboard


February 2026 Market Assessment

Segment Trend Market Condition Outlook
Middle East FOB ▼ Softer Increasing Supply Stable to Soft
East Asia CFR ▼ Softer Weak Spot Demand Soft
India CFR ▼ Softer Cautious Buying Stable
Europe CFR ► Firm Limited Availability Firm
North Africa FOB ► Stable Balanced Stable
Freight ▲ Elevated Supportive Elevated
Energy Costs ▲ Volatile Supportive Elevated

Regional Ammonia Price Assessment


February 2026 Ammonia Price Summary

Market Early February Mid-February Market Direction
Middle East FOB USD 480–515/t USD 460–510/t Softer
North Africa FOB USD 625/t USD 625/t Stable
Northwest Europe CFR USD 650–675/t USD 650–680/t Stable to Firm
India CFR USD 485–520/t USD 480–510/t Softer
East Asia CFR USD 510–540/t USD 500–540/t Softer

Regional Market Analysis


Middle East


Production Recovery Drives Correction

The Middle East remained the primary source of downward pressure during February.


In the Middle East FOB ammonia values declined from approximately USD 498/t in early February to around USD 480/t by mid-month as regional production normalized and additional spot cargoes became available


Several producers increased operating rates following earlier supply constraints, improving overall availability and reducing market tightness.


Key Market Driver

  • Higher operating rates
  • Increased spot availability
  • Improved export logistics
  • Additional cargo availability
  • Growing market length east of Suez

East of Suez Market


Supply Growth Outpaces Demand

The majority of market weakness originated east of Suez, where additional supply became available from the Middle East, Indonesia, China, and Southeast Asia.


At the same time, buyers reduced purchasing activity as they anticipated lower prices. The resulting supply surplus placed downward pressure on regional ammonia assessments.


Market Balance Assessment

Factor Market Direction
Supply Availability Increasing
Spot Demand Weakening
Market Balance Lengthening
Price Trend Softer

India


Buyers Remain Cautious

Indian ammonia buyers adopted a cautious purchasing strategy during February.


With increasing supply availability and softer international sentiment, buyers delayed purchases where possible, expecting additional price corrections.


India CFR Assessment

Market Price Range
India CFR USD 480–510/t

Although purchasing activity has slowed, India remains one of the world’s largest ammonia importers, and any increase in demand for downstream fertilizer production could quickly tighten regional balances.


Europe


Firm Despite Global Correction

Europe remained comparatively firm throughout February.


Regional buyers continued evaluating import opportunities from Southeast Asia, North Africa, and the Middle East, while local production economics remained heavily influenced by energy costs


.Unlike Asia, Europe did not experience a significant oversupply situation


European Support Factor

Factor Market Impact
Limited Local Supply Bullish
Import Dependence Bullish
Natural Gas Costs Bullish
CBAM Compliance Costs Bullish
Freight Costs Bullish

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

CBAM continued influencing European ammonia and nitrogen economics.


Importers are increasingly evaluated:

  • Embedded carbon emissions
  • Carbon compliance costs
  • Future import obligations
  • Supplier emissions profiles


As implementation progresses, lower-carbon ammonia producers may gain a competitive advantage in European markets.


North Africa


Stable Market Conditions

North African ammonia markets remained relatively balanced throughout February.


FOB values held near USD 625/t, supported by:

  • Stable export demand
  • Limited supply growth
  • Healthy European purchasing interest


North Africa remained one of the strongest regional ammonia markets during the month.


Ammonia Cost Structure


Key Cost Drivers

Factor Impact on Ammonia Economics
Natural Gas Very High
Freight High
Geopolitical Risk High
Carbon Costs Medium
Shipping Insurance Medium
Maintenance Shutdowns Medium

Natural gas remains the single most important cost component in ammonia production globally.


Freight Impact on Ammonia Trade

Ammonia freight markets remained relatively firm during February.


Limited vessel availability restricted arbitrage opportunities between eastern and western markets, slowing market adjustment mechanisms, and supporting delivered prices


Representative Freight Level

Route Freight
Ras Al Khair → Antwerp USD 90–95/t
Ras Al Khair → Ulsan USD 65–70/t
Middle East → India USD 20–25/t

Higher freight costs continued to support delivered ammonia prices despite softer FOB assessments.


Ammonia Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Market Impact
Natural Gas Price Volatility Very High Significant
Middle East Geopolitical Risk High Significant
Freight Inflation High Significant
Supply Recovery High Bearish
Weak Asian Demand Medium Bearish
CBAM Implementation Medium Structural

Q2 2026 Ammonia Outlook


Supportive Factor

  • Elevated energy costs
  • Freight inflation
  • European import dependence
  • Geopolitical risk premiums
  • Carbon compliance costs


Downside Risk

  • Growing market length east of Suez
  • Higher operating rates
  • Improved Middle East supply
  • Cautious Asian demand
  • Additional export availability

Ammonia Market Outlook Scorecard

Region Outlook
Middle East Stable to Soft
East Asia Soft
India Stable
Europe Firm
North Africa Stable
Global Market Stable to Soft

Strategic Conclusion

The ammonia market entered March 2026 with a divided regional structure.


East of Suez markets remained under pressure due to growing supply availability and cautious buyer behavior. At the same time, Europe and North Africa continued benefiting from relatively tighter fundamentals and structural import requirements


Although ammonia prices corrected from January highs, the market remains historically elevated due to energy costs, freight inflation, and geopolitical uncertainty. Consequently, the current correction appears to be a market normalization process rather than the beginning of a prolonged bearish cycle


Sulfur Market Analysis


Global Sulfur Market Overview

The global sulfur market entered a correction phase during February 2026 following one of the strongest rallies observed in recent years. After reaching multi-month highs during late 2025 and January 2026, buyers across Asia became increasingly resistant to elevated prices, leading to slower purchasing activity and moderate declines across major benchmarks.


In China, India, and Southeast Asia, the key drivers of global sulfur demand, but post-Lunar New Year purchasing activity was significantly slower than expected. Buyers delayed purchases while awaiting clearer price direction, prompting market participants to adopt a more cautious approach


.Despite the correction, the broader sulfur market remained fundamentally supported. Inventories in key consuming regions stayed below historical norms, phosphate producers continued operating at high utilization rates, and structural demand growth from Indonesia’s nickel-processing sector strengthened the longer-term outlook


Sulfur Market Dashboard


February 2026 Market Assessment

Market Segment Trend Market Condition Outlook
Middle East FOB ▼ Correcting Softer Demand Stable
China CFR ▼ Correcting Post-Holiday Slowdown Recovery Potential
India CFR ▼ Correcting Buyer Resistance Stable
Indonesia CFR ▼ Correcting Strong Industrial Demand Firm
Brazil CFR ► Stable Balanced Stable
Iran FOB ► Stable Competitive Stable
Phosphate Demand ▲ Strong Supportive Firm

Sulfur Price Assessment


Weekly Sulfur Price Summar

Market 19 February 26 February Change
Middle East FOB USD 504–508/t USD494–496/t -USD 11/t
China CFR Granular USD 520–525/t USD 512–515/t -USD 9/t
India CFR USD 526–530/t USD 513–515/t -USD 14/t
Indonesia CFR USD 520–526/t USD 513–515/t -USD 9/t
Brazil CFR USD 512–514/t USD 512–514/t Unchanged
Iran FOB USD 440–480/t USD 440–480/t Unchanged

Price Position Ranking (Average Basis)

Rank Market Average Price
1 India CFR ~USD 514/t
2 China CFR ~USD 514/t
3 Indonesia CFR ~USD 514/t
4 Brazil CFR ~USD 513/t
5 Middle East FOB ~USD 495/t
6 Iran FOB ~USD 460/t*

*Indicative midpoint of reported range.


China Market Analysis


The Most Important Global Pricing Indicator

China remained the most influential sulfur market globally during February.


Following the Lunar New Year holiday, purchasing activity slowed considerably, leading to weaker domestic prices and reduced spot market activity. However, inventory levels remain one of the strongest supportive indicators for the market


Chinese Port Inventory

Number Inventory Level
February 2024 2.63 million t
February 2025 2.19 million t
February 2026 1.80 million t

Chinese inventories are now significantly below historical levels. If buyers return aggressively in March or April, the market could tighten quickly, supporting renewed price strength.


China Market Assessment

Factor Market Impact
Low Inventories Bullish
Slower Post-Holiday Demand Bearish
Import Dependency Bullish
Phosphate Demand Bullish

India Market Analysis


Affordability Concerns Drive Correction

India experienced one of the largest corrections in sulfur prices in February.


nCFR India declined from approximately USD 528/t to USD 514/t as buyers delayed purchases to assess market direction and anticipate lower prices


Key Market Driver

  • High replacement costs
  • Buyer resistance
  • Tender delays
  • Lower spot demand
  • Expectations of further price declines


However, the issuance of FACT’s first sulfur tender for March delivery suggests that lower prices may already be attracting renewed interest in purchasing


Indonesia Market Analysis


Structural Demand Growth Continues

Indonesia remains one of the most important long-term growth markets for sulfur.


The country’s expanding nickel-processing industry continues to generate substantial demand for sulphuric acid, making sulfur consumption increasingly linked to battery materials and electric vehicle supply chains


Indonesia Sulfur Import

Year Imports
2023 3.1 million t
2024 3.6 million t
2025 5.35 million t

Growth Indicator

Metric Value
Year-on-Year Growth (2025) +48%
Global Import Ranking 3rd Largest

Indonesia is now the world’s third-largest sulfur importer after China and Morocco.


Morocco Market Analysis


A Hidden Bullish Factor

Morocco remained one of the most important supportive factors for the global sulfur market.


Weather-related disruptions delayed discharge operations at Jorf Lasfar and other phosphate-processing facilities, temporarily reducing sulfur consumption


Deferred Sulfur Demand Estimation

Estimate Volume
Low Estimate 100,000 t
High Estimate 250,000 t

This demand has not disappeared; it has merely been postponed. As logistics normalize, delayed purchasing activity is expected to return during March and April.


Iran Market Analysis


Stable but Geopolitically Sensitive

Iranian sulfur prices remained relatively stable throughout February.


Iran FOB Sulfur

Number First Name Last Name Email Address
1 Anne Evans anne.evans@mail.com
2 Bill Fernandez bill.fernandez@mail.com
3 Candice Gates candice.gates@mail.com
Hill dave.hill@mail.com
Market Price Range
Iran FOB USD 440–480/t

Iran remained one of the most competitively priced sulfur suppliers globally.


Key Risk Factor

  • Strait of Hormuz security
  • Shipping insurance costs
  • Regional military activity
  • Export logistics


Although vessel traffic remained uninterrupted during February, geopolitical developments continued influencing procurement strategies and risk assessments


Sulfur Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Market Impact
Chinese Inventory Rebuilding Very High Bullish
Moroccan Demand Recovery High Bullish
Indonesian Industrial Growth High Bullish
Strait of Hormuz Disruption High Bullish
Buyer Affordability Concerns Medium Bearish
Increased Supply Availability Medium Bearish

Sulfur Market Outlook – Q2 2026


Supportive Factor

  • Low Chinese inventories
  • Moroccan catch-up demand
  • Strong phosphate production
  • Indonesian nickel industry growth
  • Geopolitical risk premiums
  • Elevated freight costs


Downside Risk

  • Buyer resistance to high prices
  • Slower post-holiday demand
  • Increased spot availability
  • Affordability concerns

Market Outlook Scorecard

Region Outlook
China Recovery Potential
India Stable
Indonesia Firm
Brazil Stable
Middle East Stable
Iran Stable
Global Market Correcting with Recovery Potential

Strategic Conclusion

The sulfur market entered a healthy correction phase during February following an exceptionally strong rally. While short-term affordability concerns and slower Asian purchasing activity pressured prices lower, the market remains fundamentally supported.


Low inventories in China, deferred Moroccan demand, strong phosphate production, and rapid growth in Indonesia’s nickel-processing industry continue supporting the medium-term outlook


Consequently, the current correction appears to represent a temporary adjustment rather than the beginning of a sustained bearish cycle

Phosphate Market Analysis


Global Phosphate Market Overview

Phosphate markets remained among the strongest-performing fertilizer sectors in February 2026, in sharp contrast to the corrections observed in the sulfur and ammonia markets.


DAP and MAP prices strengthened throughout the month as global supply remained constrained while demand across South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Latin America stayed healthy. Tight availability from major exporters, elevated sulfur and ammonia costs, weather-related disruptions in Morocco, and limited Chinese export participation all contributed to a constructive market environment.


Unlike nitrogen markets, where rising Iranian production posed downside risks, phosphates remained fundamentally supported by structural supply constraints and resilient downstream demand.


As a result, the phosphate market entered March with one of the strongest supply-demand balances across the global fertilizer complex.


Phosphate Market Dashboard


February 2026 Market Assessment

Segment Trend Market Condition Outlook
DAP China FOB ▲ Firm Tight Supply Firm
MAP Brazil CFR ▲ Strong Import Demand Firm
DAP India CFR ▲ Firm Strong Consumption Firm
DAP Pakistan CFR ▲ Strong Import Demand Firm
DAP Egypt FOB ▲ Firm Export Strength Firm
TSP China FOB ▲ Firm Limited Supply Firm
Raw Material Costs ▲ Elevated Supportive Firm

Phosphate Price Assessment


Weekly Phosphate Price Summar

Product / Market 5 February 26 February Market Direction
DAP China FOB USD 680–725/t USD 695–725/t Firmer
DAP India CFR USD 667–669/t USD 680–682/t Firmer
MAP Brazil CFR (11-52) USD 700–720/t USD 730–740/t Firmer
DAP Pakistan CFR USD 695–705/t USD 725–727/t Firmer
DAP Egypt FOB USD 725–745/t USD 740–750/t Firmer
TSP China FOB USD 540–545/t USD 550–580/t Firmer

Price Ranking (Average Basis)

Rank Product / Market Average Value
1 DAP Egypt FOB ~USD 745/t
2 MAP Brazil CFR ~USD 735/t
3 DAP Pakistan CFR ~USD 726/t
4 DAP China FOB ~USD 710/t
5 DAP India CFR ~USD 681/t
6 TSP China FOB ~USD 565/t

China Market Analysis


Limited Exports Continue Supporting Prices

China remained one of the most important drivers of the phosphate market throughout February.


Although production levels remained adequate, export participation remained significantly below historical norms. Producers remained cautious about offering large export volumes while domestic raw material costs stayed elevated.


The limited availability of Chinese exports tightened global supply and shifted demand toward alternative suppliers, particularly Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Russia.


Impact of China’s Export Restrictions

Factor Global Market Impact
Reduced Export Availability Bullish
Higher Replacement Costs Bullish
Greater Import Dependence Bullish
Reduced Spot Liquidity Bullish

Strategic Assessment

China remains the single most important downside risk to the phosphate market. Any meaningful increase in export availability could quickly improve global supply and soften international prices.


India & South Asia Market Analysis


Demand Remains Robust

India remained one of the strongest demand centers during February.


DAP CFR prices increased steadily throughout the month, supported by

  • Strong domestic demand
  • Limited import availability
  • Higher replacement costs
  • Tight global supply conditions


Pakistan and Nepal also demonstrated stronger demand indications, contributing to overall market firmness across South Asia


South Asia Demand Dashboard

Number First Name Email Address
1 Anne anne.evans@mail.com
2 Bill Fernandez bill.fernandez@mail.com
3 Candice Gates candice.gates@mail.com
4 Dave Hill dave.hill@mail.com
Country Market Condition
India Strong
Pakistan Strong
Nepal Firm
Bangladesh Stable
Sri Lanka Improving

India’s Policy Influence

India’s phosphate and potash subsidy programs remain among the most important variables influencing global phosphate demand.


Although the government’s 2026–27 fertilizer budget proposed lower Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) spending than the previous fiscal year, demand remained healthy throughout February due to strong agricultural demand.


Morocco Market Analysis


Weather Disruptions Support Price

Morocco remained a key supportive factor for phosphate prices during February.


Weather-related disruptions affected operations at Jorf Lasfar and Safi, slowing export logistics and reducing near-term cargo availability


As one of the world’s largest phosphate exporters, even minor logistical disruptions in Morocco can significantly influence international market sentiment.


Strategic Importance of Morocco

Factor Global Importance
DAP Exports Very High
MAP Exports Very High
Phosphate Rock Critical
Phosphoric Acid Very High

Saudi Arabia Market Analysis


Strong Export Performance

Saudi Arabia’s Ma’aden continued demonstrating strong export performance throughout February.


eSales into Pakistan, Southeast Asia, and South Asia were concluded at firmer prices, confirming the strength of demand across eastern markets


Saudi Arabia remains one of the most important balancing suppliers in the global phosphate market and continues to benefit from limited Chinese export participation.


Brazil Market Analysis


Strong Prices Despite Selective Buying

Brazilian MAP prices strengthened throughout February despite cautious buying behavior from some importers.


Farmers remained focused on

  • Soybean profitability
  • Input affordability
  • Currency fluctuations


However, limited global availability prevented significant price declines.


MAP Brazil CFR Assessment

Market Price Range
MAP Brazil CFR USD 730–740/t

Key Market Drivers

Driver Impact
Limited Global Supply Bullish
Strong Agricultural Sector Bullish
Seasonal Purchasing Requirements Supportive
Tight Export Availability Bullish

Phosphate Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Market Impact
Chinese Export Policy Very High Significant
Morocco Logistics High Significant
Indian Demand High Significant
Sulfur Price Volatility High Significant
Freight Inflation High Significant
Farmer Affordability Medium Moderate

Phosphate Outlook – Q2 2026


Supportive Factor

  • Limited Chinese exports
  • Strong South Asian demand
  • Tight Moroccan logistics
  • Elevated sulfur costs
  • Healthy Brazilian imports
  • Supportive agricultural economics


Downside Risk

  • Affordability concerns
  • Potential increase in Chinese exports
  • Seasonal demand slowdown
  • Global economic uncertainty

Market Outlook Scorecard

Region Outlook
China Firm
India Firm
Pakistan Firm
Brazil Firm
Morocco Firm
Saudi Arabia Firm
Global Market Firm

Strategic Conclusion

The phosphate market remained among the strongest fertilizer sectors in February 2026.


Unlike sulfur and ammonia, which experienced corrections, phosphate markets continued benefiting from structural supply constraints, limited Chinese export participation, and resilient demand from South Asia and Latin America


.As the market enters Q2 2026, phosphates remain fundamentally supported. While affordability concerns may occasionally slow purchasing activity, the overall supply-demand balance continues to favor producers and exporters


Among all major fertilizer segments, phosphates currently exhibit one of the most constructive medium-term outlooks


NPK Market Analysis


Global NPK Market Overview

The global NPK market remained firm throughout February 2026, supported by elevated raw material costs, healthy agricultural demand, and limited availability of competitively priced compound fertilizers.


Unlike sulfur and ammonia, which experienced moderate corrections during the month, NPK values remained resilient as producers continued facing high production costs. Elevated prices for urea, DAP, MAP, MOP, ammonia, and sulfur helped maintain firm pricing structures across major compound fertilizer markets.


Demand remained particularly strong in South Asia, West Africa, and parts of Southeast Asia, while European buyers continued balancing affordability concerns against nutrient requirements for the upcoming growing season.


.The combination of elevated input costs and stable demand prevented significant downward pressure on NPK pricing during February.


NPK Market Dashboard


February 2026 Market Assessment

Segment Trend Market Condition Outlook
NPK 15-15-15 West Africa CFR ▲ Firm Strong Import Demand Firm
NPK 15-15-15 Morocco FOB ▲ Firm Strong Import Demand Firm
NPK 16-16-16 Southeast Asia CFR ► Stable Balanced Stable
NPK 10-26-26 India CFR ▲ Firm Strong Demand Firm
Raw Material Costs ▲ Elevated Cost Supportive Elevated
Producer Margins ► Stable Balanced Stable

NPK Price Assessment


February 2026 Price Summar

Product Market Price Range
NPK 15-15-15 West Africa CFR USD 500–525/t
NPK 15-15-15 Morocco FOB USD 463–571/t
NPK 16-16-16 Southeast Asia CFR USD 440–450/t
NPK 10-26-26 India CFR USD 494–496/t

Price Ranking (Average Basis)

Number First Name Last Name
1 Anne Evans
2 Bill Fernandez bill.fernandez@mail.com
3 Candice Gates candice.gates@mail.com
4 Dave Hill dave.hill@mail.com
Rank Product Average Price
1 NPK 15-15-15 West Africa CFR ~USD 513/t
2 BillNPK 10-26-26 India CFR ~USD 495/t
3 CandiceNPK 15-15-15 Morocco FOB ~USD 517/t*
4 NPK 16-16-16 Southeast Asia CFR ~USD 445/t

*Wide reported FOB range reflecting product specifications and destination requirements.


Regional Market Analysis


India


Strong Demand for Phosphate-Rich Grades

India remained one of the most important centers of NPK demand during February.


Government support programs and strong agricultural activity continued to support compound fertilizer consumption. The market showed particular strength for phosphate-rich grades such as NPK 10-26-26, reflecting continued demand from cereal, oilseed, and horticultural producers.


Key Market Drivers

  • Strong agricultural demand
  • Government support programs
  • Elevated phosphate demand
  • Stable import activity

West Africa


Import Demand Remains Strong

West Africa remained one of the strongest NPK import markets globally.


Countries including Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, Benin, and Nigeria continued importing significant volumes of compound fertilizers for cocoa, maize, rice, and other cash crops.


West Africa CFR Assessment

Product Price Range
NPK 15-15-15 CFR USD 500–525/t

The region continues to benefit from long-term agricultural expansion, improved fertilizer penetration rates, and government-supported agricultural development programs.


Southeast Asia


Balanced Market Conditions

Southeast Asian markets remained relatively balanced throughout February.


While affordability concerns occasionally slowed purchasing activity, demand remained sufficient to support pricing.


Key Demand Drivers

Factor Importance
Palm Oil Production High
Rice Production High
Export Agriculture High
Plantation Crops Medium

Europe


Cost Pressures Continue Supporting Price

European compound fertilizer markets remained supported by:

  • Elevated energy costs
  • Carbon compliance costs
  • Tight nutrient availability
  • Higher logistics expenses


Although buyers remained cautious, replacement costs continued to support producer pricing throughout February.


NPK Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Market Impact
Urea Price Volatility High Significant
Phosphate Supply Constraints High Significant
Freight Inflation High Significant
Energy Costs High Significant
Potash Market Tightness Medium Moderate
Farmer Affordability Medium Moderate

NPK Outlook – Q2 2026

Supportive Factors

  • Elevated raw material costs
  • Strong agricultural demand
  • Limited phosphate availability
  • Freight inflation
  • Government fertilizer support programs


Downside Risk

  • Affordability concerns
  • Seasonal demand normalization
  • Potential nutrient substitution

NPK Outlook Scorecard

Region Outlook
India Firm
West Africa Firm
Southeast Asia Stable
Europe Firm
Global Market Firm

Strategic Conclusion

The NPK market remained fundamentally supported throughout February 2026. High production costs, healthy agricultural demand, and tight phosphate availability continued to prevent significant price declines.


Among all fertilizer segments, NPK products remain among the most resilient categories heading into Q2 2026, supported by strong agricultural fundamentals and elevated raw material costs.


Potash Market Analysis


Global Potash Market Overview

The global potash market remained relatively stable throughout February 2026, although sentiment remained firmer outside the United States.


Unlike urea and phosphates, potash did not experience substantial price volatility during the month. However, regional supply-demand imbalances continued to create localized premiums, particularly in Brazil and parts of Southeast Asia.


The most notable development was the widening premium for Brazilian granular MOP over the US market, reaching its highest level since March 2023.


This reflected:

  • Low inventories in Brazil
  • Strong agricultural demand
  • Excess availability in the US market


Overall, potash remained one of the most balanced fertilizer segments during February.


Potash Market Dashboard


February 2026 Market Assessment

Segment Trend Market Condition Outlook
Brazil MOP CFR ▲ Firm Tight Supply Firm
Southeast Asia MOP CFR ► Stable Balanced Stable
Australia MOP CFR ▲ Firm Healthy Demand Firm
Europe MOP CFR ► Stable Balanced Stable
India Contract Negotiations Pending Market Supportive Firm

Potash Price Assessment


February 2026 Price Summary

Product / Market Price
Brazil Granular MOP CFR USD 370–380/t
Southeast Asia Standard MOP CFR USD 360–389/t
Thailand/Vietnam Granular MOP CFR USD 380–390/t
Australia Granular MOP CFR USD 420–425/t
Europe Granular MOP CFR* USD 370–385/t equivalent

*Converted from regional European pricing references for consistency.


Price Ranking (Average Basis)

Rank Market Average Price
1 Australia CFR ~USD 423/t
2 Thailand/Vietnam CFR ~USD 385/t
3 Europe CFR ~USD 378/t
4 Brazil CFR ~USD 375/t
5 Southeast Asia Standard CFR ~USD 375/t

Regional Market Analysis


Brazi


The Strongest Potash Market

Brazil remained the strongest potash market globally during February.


Key Driver

  • Low inventories
  • Strong soybean economics
  • Seasonal demand
  • Limited nearby availability


Brazil’s premium over the US market reached its highest level in nearly three years, highlighting the strength of local demand fundamentals.


India


Contract Negotiations Remain a Key Variable

India’s annual potash contract negotiations remained unresolved throughout February.


eMarket participants generally expected a higher settlement price compared with previous contracts, which helped support global sentiment


Potential Market Impact

Scenario Market Effect
Higher Contract Settlement Bullish
Similar Contract Settlement Neutral
Lower Contract Settlement Bearish

Southeast Asia


Stable Demand Fundamental

Demand remained stable across Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam.


Palm oil and rice production continued supporting potash consumption, while market conditions remained broadly balanced


Potash Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Market Impact
India Contract Settlement High Significant
Brazilian Demand High Significant
Freight Costs Medium Moderate
Agricultural Economics Medium Moderate
Supply Availability Medium Moderate

Potash Outlook – Q2 2026

Supportive Factors

  • Strong Brazilian demand
  • Low inventories
  • Potentially higher India contract settlement
  • Stable agricultural fundamentals


Downside Risks

  • Adequate global supply
  • Affordability concerns
  • Seasonal demand slowdown

Potash Outlook Scorecard

Region Outlook
Brazil Firm
India Firm
Southeast Asia Stable
Europe Stable
Europe Stable to Firm

Strategic Conclusion

Potash remained one of the most stable fertilizer markets during February 2026. While price increases were less dramatic than those observed in urea and phosphates, the market remained fundamentally healthy.


Strong Brazilian demand, low inventories, and expectations surrounding India’s contract negotiations continued to support sentiment. As a result, potash enters Q2 2026 with a balanced but constructive outlook.


Petrochemical Market Analysis


Global Petrochemical Market Overview

The global petrochemical market remained mixed throughout February 2026 as producers and traders balanced volatile feedstock costs, uncertain industrial demand, elevated freight expenses, and increasing geopolitical risks in the Persian Gulf.


Unlike fertilizer markets, which remained broadly supported by agricultural demand, petrochemical markets displayed greater regional divergence. Demand in parts of Asia remained weaker than expected, while Europe continued facing manufacturing challenges and elevated energy costs. At the same time, export-oriented producers in the Middle East benefited from competitive feedstock economics and strong positions within global supply chains.


Overall, the market environment during February was characterized by cautious stability. Most petrochemical products avoided significant price declines, but few generated sustained bullish momentum.


Petrochemical Market Dashboard


February 2026 Market Assessment

Segment Trend Market Condition Outlook
Methanol ► Stable Balanced Stable
Polyethylene (PE) ► Mixed Weak Demand Neutral
Polypropylene (PP) ► Mixed Margin Pressure Neutral
PVC ▲ Slightly Firm Construction Demand Stable to Firm
Aromatics ► Mixed Feedstock Driven Mixed
Freight ▲ Elevated Supportive Elevated
Feedstocks ▲ Volatile Uncertain Volatile
Geopolitical Risk ▲ High Critical High

Key Market Drivers


1. Persian Gulf Shipping Risk

The Persian Gulf remained one of the most important variables influencing petrochemical markets during February.

Although no significant shipping disruptions occurred, traders increasingly incorporated geopolitical risk premiums into pricing models, particularly for export-oriented products originating from the Gulf region.


Impact on Petrochemical Trade

Product Category Impact Level
Methanol Very High
Polyethylene High
Polypropylene High
Aromatics High
Base Chemicals High
Solvents Medium

While vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remained uninterrupted, elevated risk perceptions continued supporting insurance costs and freight premiums.


2. Energy Market Volatility

Feedstock costs remained unstable throughout February.


Petrochemical producers continued to monitor closely:

  • Natural gas prices
  • LNG markets
  • Crude oil benchmarks
  • Naphtha prices
  • Condensate values


Movements in these markets directly influenced production economics and operating decisions.


Feedstock Sensitivity Matrix

Product Natural Gas Exposure Oil Exposure
Methanol Very High Low
Polyethylene Medium High
Polypropylene Medium High
PVC Medium High
Aromatics Low Very High

3. Weak Manufacturing Demand in Asia

Several Asian economies continued experiencing slower industrial growth than expected.


Demand remained weaker across

  • China
  • South Korea
  • Taiwan
  • Southeast Asia


This softness limited downstream consumption of polymers and industrial chemicals, contributing to margin pressure across several petrochemical chains


Market Impact

Number First Name Email Address
1 Anne anne.evans@mail.com
2 Bill Fernandez bill.fernandez@mail.com
3 Candice Gates candice.gates@mail.com
4 Dave Hill dave.hill@mail.com
Factor Effect
Slower Manufacturing Activity Lower Polymer Consumption
Weaker Industrial Output Margin Compression
Reduced Purchasing Activity Softer Spot Demand
Inventory Management More Cautious Buying

4. Elevated Freight Costs

Freight remained one of the most important supporting factors for petrochemical pricing.


Even when demand weakened, higher transportation costs increased delivered replacement values and limited downside pressure on international prices


Freight Impact by Product

Product Freight Sensitivity
Methanol Very High
Polyethylene High
Polypropylene High
Aromatics Medium
PVC Medium

Methanol Market Analysis


Market Remains Relatively Balanced

Methanol remained one of the most strategically important petrochemical products throughout February.


The market was supported by

  • Stable industrial demand
  • Continued energy-sector consumption
  • Limited freight flexibility
  • Strong dependence on Persian Gulf exports


:However, weaker Chinese industrial activity prevented stronger upward price momentum


Methanol Market Driver

Factor Impact
Chinese Demand Neutral
Energy Prices Bullish
Freight Costs Bullish
Geopolitical Risk Bullish
Supply Availability Neutral

Polymer Market Analysis


Polyethylene (PE)

Polyethylene markets remained mixed throughout February.


)While packaging demand remained relatively healthy, weaker manufacturing activity and slower industrial consumption limited stronger growth


PE Market Assessment

Region Market Condition
Asia Soft
Europe Stable
Middle East Supportive
Africa Improving

Polypropylene (PP)

Polypropylene markets continued facing margin pressure due to weaker industrial demand.


The automotive and manufacturing sectors delivered mixed performance across major consuming regions, limiting a stronger recovery in demand


Key PP Market Driver

  • Manufacturing demand
  • Automotive production
  • Feedstock costs
  • Freight rates

Factor Impact
Construction Activity Bullish
Infrastructure Spending Bullish
Energy Costs Bullish
Freight Costs Supportive

Aromatics Market Analysis

The aromatics sector remained highly sensitive to movements in crude oil and naphtha markets.


Products, including benzene, toluene, and xylene, experienced mixed performance as refiners adjusted production levels and industrial buyers remained cautious


Key Aromatics Driver

Driver Importance
Crude Oil Prices Very High
Naphtha Costs Very High
Manufacturing Demand High
Freight Costs Medium

Strategic Importance of the Persian Gulf


Why the Strait of Hormuz Matters

For petrochemical markets, the Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most important maritime chokepoints.


A significant share of global exports of:

  • Methanol
  • Polymers
  • Base chemicals
  • LPG
  • LNG
  • Petrochemical feedstocks


passes through this corridor.


Strategic Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Risk Level Potential Impact
Strait of Hormuz Disruption Very High Severe
Energy Price Spike High Significant
Freight Inflation High Significant
Feedstock Volatility High Significant
Asian Demand Weakness Medium Moderate

Petrochemical Outlook – Q2 2026

Supportive Factors

  • Elevated freight costs
  • Geopolitical risk premiums
  • Stable energy demand
  • Strong Middle Eastern export position
  • Infrastructure spending in emerging markets


Downside Risk

  • Weak Asian manufacturing demand
  • Margin compression
  • Slower industrial growth
  • Feedstock volatility

Market Outlook Scorecard

Segment Q2 2026 Outlook
Methanol Stable
Polyethylene Neutral
Polypropylene Neutral
PVC Stable to Firm
Aromatics Mixed
Petrochemical Sector Mixed

Strategic Conclusion

The global petrochemical market remained balanced but cautious throughout February 2026.


While weaker industrial demand in parts of Asia limited stronger price momentum, elevated freight costs, geopolitical uncertainty, and volatile feedstock markets prevented significant downside pressure


For
Green Gubre Group and international commodity traders, the most important strategic consideration remains the Persian Gulf. Any disruption affecting the Strait of Hormuz would have consequences far beyond fertilizers, influencing methanol, polymers, aromatics, petrochemical feedstocks, LNG, and broader global chemical trade flows.


Consequently, geopolitical developments in the Persian Gulf should remain a central monitoring priority throughout Q2 2026.


Freight & Logistics Outlook


Global Freight Market Outlook

Freight remained one of the most important supportive factors for fertilizer and petrochemical prices throughout February 2026. While commodity fundamentals varied across individual markets, elevated logistics costs continued to increase delivered prices and limit downside pressure.


Geopolitical uncertainty in the Persian Gulf, Baltic winter conditions, higher insurance premiums, vessel availability constraints, and weather-related disruptions supported freight rates across major fertilizer and petrochemical trade routes


Freight has increasingly evolved from a transportation cost to a strategic market variable that directly influences procurement decisions, trade flows, inventory management, and global price formation


Key Sulfur Freight Assessments (26 February 2026)

Route Freight (USD/t)
Middle East → East Coast India 20–22
Middle East → Indonesia 22–24
Middle East → South China 23–27
Middle East → Brazil 27-28
US Gulf → Brazil 23–25
Baltic → Brazil 70-73

Key Freight Drivers


Persian Gulf Risk Premium

  • Elevated marine insurance costs
  • Higher vessel charter rates
  • Increased voyage risk calculations
  • Greater supply-chain contingency costs


Baltic Winter Condition

  • Ice restrictions and limited ice-class vessel availability
  • Delayed vessel turnaround times
  • Higher freight costs on long-haul export routes


Vessel Availability

  • Longer positioning times
  • Reduced prompt tonnage availability
  • Increased replacement freight costs


Insurance Cost

  • Persistent geopolitical risk premiums
  • Higher operating costs for Gulf-related voyages
  • Increased delivered fertilizer replacement values


Freight Risk Matrix

Number First Name Last Name
1 Anne Evans
2 Bill Fernandez bill.fernandez@mail.com
3 Candice Gates candice.gates@mail.com
4 Dave Hill dave.hill@mail.com
Risk Factor Risk Level Market Impact
Strait of Hormuz Tensions Very High Severe
Freight Inflation High Significant
Insurance Premiums High Significant
Vessel Availability High Significant
Baltic Ice Conditions Medium Moderate
Fuel Price Volatility Medium Moderate

Freight Outlook – Q2 2026

Region Outlook
Persian Gulf Routes Elevated
India Routes Firm
Brazil Routes Elevated
China Routes Firm
Baltic Routes Elevated
Black Sea Routes Stable

Overall, freight markets are expected to remain elevated during Q2 2026, particularly for fertilizer and petrochemical cargoes originating from the Persian Gulf. Even without direct disruption, geopolitical uncertainty is likely to sustain a meaningful risk premium across global shipping markets.


Q2 2026 Market Outlook


Global Fertilizer & Petrochemical Outlook

The most probable scenario for Q2 2026 is not a broad market correction, but rather selective adjustments across individual commodity groups.


Markets supported by structural supply constraints and healthy demand are expected to remain firm, while sectors experiencing improving supply availability may face moderate downward pressure


Q2 2026 Outlook Dashboard

Segment Outlook Key Driver
Urea Firm to Slightly Softer India Demand vs. Iran Recovery
Ammonia Stable to Softer East of Suez Supply Length
Sulphur Corrective with Recovery Potentia China Inventories & Morocco Deman
Phosphates Firm Tight Supply & Limited China Exports
NPK Firm Elevated Raw Material Costs
Potash Stable to Firm Brazil Demand & India Contract
Petrochemicals Mixed Energy & Freight Volatility
Freight Elevated Persian Gulf Risk Premium

Regional Outlook Assessment

Region Outlook Key Driver
India Strong Fertilizer Subsidies & Agricultural Demand
Brazil Firm Soybean Sector & Import Requirements
China Critical Variable Export Policies & Industrial Activity
Middle East Strategic Geopolitics & Energy Exports

Key Bullish Factors


  • Strong Indian fertilizer demand
  • Limited Chinese phosphate exports
  • Tight phosphate supply
  • Low sulfur inventories in China
  • Elevated freight rates
  • Healthy agricultural fundamentals
  • Persistent geopolitical risk premiums


Key Downside Risk



  • Iranian production recovery
  • Improving ammonia supply
  • Affordability concerns
  • Potential increase in Chinese exports
  • Slower industrial activity in Asia


Strategic Risk Matrix

Risk Factor Probability Market Impact
Strait of Hormuz Disruption Low-Medium Very High
Chinese Export Recovery Medium High
Iranian Production Growth High Medium
Energy Price Spike Medium High
Freight Cost Escalation High Medium
Weak Global Growth Medium Medium

Executive Strategic Conclusions

  • Producers: Maintain pricing discipline while closely monitoring Indian procurement activity, Chinese export policies, and developments in the Persian Gulf.
  • Traders: Freight dynamics, logistics optimization, and regional arbitrage opportunities are expected to remain major drivers of profitability throughout Q2 2026.
  • Importers: Forward coverage remains advisable for phosphates and compound fertilizers, as supply constraints continue to support prices.
  • Investors: Fertilizer markets remain fundamentally stronger than most industrial commodity sectors heading into Q2 2026, particularly for phosphates, NPKs, and premium nitrogen products.

Final Market Conclusion

February 2026 demonstrated that fertilizer and petrochemical markets remain highly interconnected through freight, energy, and geopolitical risk.


While sulfur and ammonia entered correction phases, phosphates, NPKs, and much of the nitrogen complex remained fundamentally supported. Freight markets continued to provide significant cost support, while developments in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz remained central to global commodity trade flows.


Looking ahead, Q2 2026 is expected to be characterized by selective market adjustments rather than broad weakness. Among all major segments, phosphates and NPKs currently exhibit the strongest fundamentals, while freight, energy, and geopolitical developments will continue shaping market direction throughout the quarter.



Conclusion

February 2026 confirmed that global fertilizer and petrochemical markets remain highly sensitive to agricultural demand, supply availability, logistics costs, and geopolitical developments.


The nitrogen sector remained the strongest-performing segment of the fertilizer market, supported by robust Indian demand, resilient Brazilian imports, and limited Chinese export participation. In contrast, ammonia softened as Middle Eastern supply improved and additional cargoes became available east of Suez.


Sulfur prices corrected from January highs as Asian buyers temporarily stepped back from the market. However, low Chinese inventories, delayed Moroccan demand, and continued growth in Indonesia’s nickel-processing sector continue supporting the medium-term outlook. Phosphate markets remained firm throughout February, driven by tight supply, limited Chinese exports, and healthy demand across South Asia and Latin America. NPK and potash markets also maintained stable-to-firm fundamentals supported by elevated raw material costs and solid agricultural demand.


Freight markets remained a key source of support across both fertilizer and petrochemical sectors. Elevated insurance costs, vessel constraints, and geopolitical uncertainty continued to increase delivered costs and sustain market risk premiums.


Looking ahead to Q2 2026, the most likely scenario is selective market adjustment rather than broad-based weakness. Phosphates, NPKs, and potash are expected to remain the strongest-performing segments, while urea and sulfur may experience short-term volatility.


The Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz remain the most important strategic risks for global commodity markets. Even without direct disruption, geopolitical uncertainty is expected to continue influencing freight costs, trade flows, and pricing dynamics.


Overall, the fertilizer market enters Q2 2026 in a fundamentally constructive position, supported by healthy agricultural demand, relatively tight inventories, and persistent geopolitical and logistical risk prem.